Short answer
PPP stands for presentation, practice and production. The teacher first introduces or highlights new language, then learners practise it with support, and finally they use it more independently in communication.
In S06E16, Em describes PPP as a familiar lesson sequence. It can make planning easier because each stage has a clear purpose and the lesson moves from more support towards more learner independence.
Try this in your next lesson
Presentation: Do learners understand the meaning as well as the form?
👇 Scroll down for our practical checklist or activity and download.
Listen to the whole S06E16 discussion in our podcast episode guide here🔊.
During presentation, the target language should appear in a meaningful context. That might be a short dialogue, a story, an article, a picture, a teacher example or something that has already emerged from conversation. The aim is not simply to write a structure on the board. Learners need to understand what the language is doing.
During practice, learners can work with the form in a safer, more controlled way. Gap fills, matching, sentence building, substitution, pronunciation work and short question-and-answer tasks can all help. This is where accuracy can receive more attention.
The production stage is where things get interesting. A teacher may design a lovely speaking task and discover that learners complete it successfully without using the target language at all. Communication worked, but the planned grammar vanished.
That does not automatically mean the task failed. It may show that learners can already communicate the idea with other language. A prompt can encourage use of the target form, but teachers should also ask whether the language will reappear later without that prompt.
PPP is therefore best treated as a useful planning shape rather than a law. Real lessons loop backwards and forwards. Learners may need more input after practice, or a production task may reveal that the original presentation was not enough.
When does PPP become too rigid?
It becomes rigid when the teacher feels obliged to complete every stage exactly as planned even though learners need something different. The sequence should serve the learning, not the other way round.
Our suggested classroom adaptation of the episode discussion.
Gav and Em suggest: The PPP reality check
- ☐ Presentation: Do learners understand the meaning as well as the form?
- ☐ Practice: Are they actually manipulating the target language?
- ☐ Production: Does the task give them a genuine reason to use it?
- ☐ Can learners use the form again later without being pushed?
- ☐ If the class needs to loop back, are you willing to change the plan?
📥 Download the free teacher practice card (PDF)
Related teaching ideas
📚 Take a Look at More Related Articles on Lesson Planning, Materials & Teaching Techniques